Skip to main content

The Tree of Life

Young Earth Creationists frequently make the claim that before the fall there was no death, not in humans or in animals. For this reason alone evolution must be rejected out of hand, it simply cannot be true. Granted, they then go on to try their best to disprove Darwinian evolution on "scientific" grounds but I do not find their reasoning on this subject to be very convincing. Still, it seems the death question is their biggest objection.

Today I was pondering Genesis 3:22-24:

Genesis 3:22-24 (ESV)
22 Then the Lord God said, “Behold, the man has become like one of us in knowing good and evil. Now, lest he reach out his hand and take also of the tree of life and eat, and live forever—” 23 therefore the Lord God sent him out from the garden of Eden to work the ground from which he was taken. 24 He drove out the man, and at the east of the garden of Eden he placed the cherubim and a flaming sword that turned every way to guard the way to the tree of life.

Several thoughts occur to me in light of this particular passage, one is if that man was initially made immortal what was the purpose of the tree of life? The other thing that came to me was how would Adam even understand what death was if there had been no death around him to observe?

Here is my take on it. There was animal death for the billions of years before the creation of Adam and Eve. That is how Adam could be expected to know just what the consequences of his sin would be. God used evolution (the details of this are unknown to me at this time) in some form, divinely guided evolution or maybe special creation of kinds followed by speciation via natural selection or whatever, to bring about the world as we know it today and eventually created Adam and Eve in a special creation event. The tree of life was to be used later on to give eternal life to Adam and Eve, but they were created like the other animals, from the dust of the ground and so mortal without the tree of life.

OK, so I haven't really thought this all out, it just seems to make a certain amount of sense that there would be a reason for the tree of life to be there! That reason would be to give life. It makes sense to me and fits with what we know of both the bible and the natural world.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NBC anti-life?

I would boycott NBC, if I ever watched it that is. I actually never watch anything on the old line networks, NBC, CBS, ABC, FOX. Everything I watch is on the cable only stations... do they still broadcast over the air? Ah well, this story is about the fact that it seems NBC refused to air an ad put together by some Catholic outfit that features an embryo and all of the hardships it faced in early life ending up with the revelation that they were talking about Obama. Here is the ad , check it out and see how unoffensive it is. Like I said, if I watched them I'd quit now. :-/

Wikileaks and police state censorship

I saw an article today on SF Gate about some nit wit Bush appointed Federal Judge ordering a website I'd never heard of called Wikileaks shut down because they were publishing some bank documents from some corrupt Swiss bank. The amusing thing is that they can't actually do it! Even more amusing is that this just draws attention to the site and makes it that much more visible, yay idiot goons! :-) There are mirror sites all over the world and it's almost impossible for thuggish police state goons to figure out how to close off all of the leaks :-) One mirror site is here: http://wikileaks.be/wiki/Wikileaks The US site they tried to close down is still here: http://88.80.13.160 "Cowardice asks the question, 'Is it safe?' Expediency asks the question, 'Is it politic?' Vanity asks the question, 'Is it popular?' But, conscience asks the question, 'Is it right?' And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe,...

Child Driven Education

Here is a Ted Talk with Sugata Mitra on Child Driven Education... very unschooling-like I think.  :-)  I've seen videos of him before, this is an update on his research on letting groups of kids learn on the internet, mostly without any supervision at all.  Posted via email from The Angry Gnome