Skip to main content

Software "Upgrades"

I know that software engineers or programmers or whatever they call themselves need to justify staying on the payroll by producing things.  Really, I do understand this concept.  But why do they insist on "improving" products that work perfectly already?  If you try to improve something that is already RIGHT in every way then you can only make is LESS RIGHT!  Two examples I've encountered recently are the Thunderbird email program, the one I'm using at this very moment and Mozy online back up, which is running in the background right now. 

Thunderbird went from being slick and fast to being grindingly slow after the last "upgrade" they did.  Now it does some nonsensical thing that serves no purpose I can discern called "indexing" that supposedly allows me to find emails better, though it doesn't actually do that.  They were easier to find in the previous version with a simple key word search.  Now the program sucks resources and almost stops downloading new emails while it "decides what to index".  Really?  Who cares?  I just want to read my email, NOW!

Mozy went from having a pretty informative interface that told you an estimated time for the backup it was doing, to an interface that might as well not be there at all for all the info it gives.  Plus I'd swear the downloads are now taking at least twice as long but that could be due to new files being generated by the stupid "INDEXING" that Thunderbird is doing. 

Both of these programs were better six months ago than they are now after being "IMPROVED"  Thanks for nothing guys.

BUT, they are still way better than other programs that claim to do the same thing... they just aren't as good as they once were. 

Oh, and then there is Virus Protection Software.  I think the biggest and nastiest VIRUS out there is McAfee itself!  And that is the better of the choices between the biggest 2 - Norton and McAfee, at least in my experience.  The darned thing buts in and updates every single day, sometimes more than once and last night it made me restart my computer to finish the upgrade.  I am not convinced that there are that many dedicated virus makers out there that make such dangerous computer viruses that the stupid program needs to slow my computer down daily for minutes at a time, usually when I'm busy with something else.  I suspect that it's like the BART station agents who, I'm convinced without real evidence, work closely with bike stealing gangs, in exchange for cash or something, to get bikes ripped off from inside BART stations!  I'm also convinced, without evidence, that McAfee and other virus protection makers, actually are the source of 99.9% of the computer viruses they "detect" out there.  So there.  :-P

Posted via email from The Angry Gnome

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NBC anti-life?

I would boycott NBC, if I ever watched it that is. I actually never watch anything on the old line networks, NBC, CBS, ABC, FOX. Everything I watch is on the cable only stations... do they still broadcast over the air? Ah well, this story is about the fact that it seems NBC refused to air an ad put together by some Catholic outfit that features an embryo and all of the hardships it faced in early life ending up with the revelation that they were talking about Obama. Here is the ad , check it out and see how unoffensive it is. Like I said, if I watched them I'd quit now. :-/

Viva California! USA out of California Now!

Gene Veith points to a Russian who predicts the breakup the American Empire. Gene is somehow unaware of the dozens of secessionist movements in various states. Granted they are almost all small but still, they exist and this could be a good time for us. Those who know me already understand that I'm a California Nationalist who I doesn't think California should have joined those united States in the first place. Being a part of that empire just costs us money, we get nothing in return. These days we get to be hated by foreigners for being Americans and mocked by Americans for being Californians. Getting us out of the US yesterday would be a day too late as far as I'm concerned.

Government = Violence

What it comes down to is this, any law you propose states this, I will kill you if you do not agree to do "X." I say this because ALL laws say this. All . Jay walking is a "crime." So, what does that mean? It means if you jay walk you risk death at the hands of government enforcers. How so? You are accosted while jay walking by the local police. You say, "Buzz off bucko!" The cop says "you are under arrest!" You say "Not even." They attempt to restrain you and you resist, you are now "resisting arrest" and in the process of subduing you force will be used to make you to comply. The harder you resist the more likely "they" are to simply kill you. All laws imply deadly force. All laws = the death penalty. Of course they won't say you are being killed for the "crime" of jay walking, but for resisting arrest or attempting to escape or whatever, but really it's the original "crim