Skip to main content

Where I am on the CREATION/EVOLUTION CONTINUUM

Ah, there I am, Theistic Evolution, right there just a hair up from Atheistic Evolution. My more fundamentalist friends will be dismayed I'm sure. :-)

I got this little chart from the National Center for Science Education website while reading this article about the Creation Evolution Continuum. What it essentially means is that while acknowledging that God indeed has created and sustains and guides the cosmos, I also acknowledge the legitimate findings of science concerning such things as the age of the earth and the common descent of current life from one or a few original, simple forms. I also agree with the Catholics that humans were specially endowed with a soul at some point in this process but that we and the great apes may very well be physically descended from a common ancestor.

The idea of Progressive Creation as exemplified by Reasons to Believes Hugh Ross and his ministry is quite attractive to me, because the science is so much better than that of AnswersInGenesis and the other Young Earth bozos, but I find it unsatisfying in the end, it simply does not have the ring of truth for me. There is way to much compelling evidence for common descent that they try to explain away, it just won't really work as science. Besides, I don't really see the need for it theologically, Christianity does not depend on it.

Comments

  1. Hello fellow INTP Lutheran, I'm glad you posted this info, because I haven't found an exact place on the scale for me yet. Only because I haven't searched one out, mind you.

    Just the other day, when I went on a "we aren't different races" rant, I then thought about the creation theories, and how they fit in with that. Ironically you were thinking things in the same direction.

    Will check out your links on it now....

    ReplyDelete
  2. So far, I also agree that the "primordial soup" theory has no real possibility, not hard to believe.

    I believe I must fall somewhere between Theistic Evolution and Progressive Creationism, but I am not sure of the boundaries in both those rankings at this time.

    Young Earth theory is not a possibility for me, for the mere fact that I strongly believe we are indeed all related, and firmly believe that the different "races" theory is garbage. Therefore, we had to change over a period of time.

    Now whether that is rooted in the folic acid idea, the sunlight factor, or just the concept that humans early on had more variety of features within the small tribe, I don't know. I do know people can look different in a small amount of generations, so I lean towards some possible environmental factors mixed in with our own human genes mixing things up as the source.

    Will have to read in depth the categories, maybe I can find a more specific area for me!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Cool, I'm not attached to any one spot on the continuum, but I am no where near the Young Earth end I know for sure. I enjoy listening to the Reasons to Believe podcasts but it really seems like they are stretching quite a bit to deny common descent when it seems pretty obvious to me. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  4. The "gap" creation department just seems to be a add-on for another bad theory. I never heard of that before.

    Great resources, thank you!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NBC anti-life?

I would boycott NBC, if I ever watched it that is. I actually never watch anything on the old line networks, NBC, CBS, ABC, FOX. Everything I watch is on the cable only stations... do they still broadcast over the air? Ah well, this story is about the fact that it seems NBC refused to air an ad put together by some Catholic outfit that features an embryo and all of the hardships it faced in early life ending up with the revelation that they were talking about Obama. Here is the ad , check it out and see how unoffensive it is. Like I said, if I watched them I'd quit now. :-/

Wikileaks and police state censorship

I saw an article today on SF Gate about some nit wit Bush appointed Federal Judge ordering a website I'd never heard of called Wikileaks shut down because they were publishing some bank documents from some corrupt Swiss bank. The amusing thing is that they can't actually do it! Even more amusing is that this just draws attention to the site and makes it that much more visible, yay idiot goons! :-) There are mirror sites all over the world and it's almost impossible for thuggish police state goons to figure out how to close off all of the leaks :-) One mirror site is here: http://wikileaks.be/wiki/Wikileaks The US site they tried to close down is still here: http://88.80.13.160 "Cowardice asks the question, 'Is it safe?' Expediency asks the question, 'Is it politic?' Vanity asks the question, 'Is it popular?' But, conscience asks the question, 'Is it right?' And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe,...

Child Driven Education

Here is a Ted Talk with Sugata Mitra on Child Driven Education... very unschooling-like I think.  :-)  I've seen videos of him before, this is an update on his research on letting groups of kids learn on the internet, mostly without any supervision at all.  Posted via email from The Angry Gnome