Skip to main content

Only a Theory

I finished reading "Only a Theory" by Kenneth Miller the other day and I must say that he succeeds in taking apart the Intelligent Design (ID) camp pretty thoroughly. The book makes a very compelling case that ID is not really science in the way we normally define science. I won't go into detail here but many of the examples of "irreducible complexity" touted by the ID camp have been refuted already and even more damning as far as I'm concerned is the fact that the ID people have utterly failed to produce any actual original research based on the idea of design. I have read several books by the most prominent ID proponents in recent months and while on the surface they make a certain amount of sense, far more than the Young Earth Creationist folk do at least, in the end they spent almost all of their energy pointing out how they just can't imagine how evolution could produce the features they are seeing. Basically I saw it as simply an argument based on lack of imagination ;-) Just because they can't imagine how it could have happened they fall back on "God must have done it!"

Well, I do think that "God did it." I just think that he used natural means to pull it off. I don't really see the need to bring in miraculous intervention on the edges of our knowledge the way the ID crowd likes to do. My take on the whole thing is that God, being the omniscient and omnipotent creator of the cosmos, set everything into motion with full awareness of the end state of things, there was no need for intervention after that. Oops, that sort of makes me a deist doesn't it? I need to hash out what I'm thinking here a bit more I guess, because I don't maintain that God never intervenes in the world, or that he can't, merely that as far as the progress of the natural world goes he allows things to move naturally for the most part. It is also my belief that God upholds the entire creation at each and every moment, nothing exists that God does not sustain, if He withdrew His sustaining power all of creation would simply cease to exist, He knows the position of every particle in all of existence at every moment and where it will be in a billion years and where it was 12 billion years ago. He has no need to reach into the world and tinker every few million years to bring about a new species of beetle or sea snail, or you and me for that matter.

Anyway, I'm now reading a book called "Saving Darwin, How to be a Christian and Believe in Evolution" by Karl Giberson that I hope will help me to clarify what I'm trying to say here. I'll let you know how that works out ;-)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NBC anti-life?

I would boycott NBC, if I ever watched it that is. I actually never watch anything on the old line networks, NBC, CBS, ABC, FOX. Everything I watch is on the cable only stations... do they still broadcast over the air? Ah well, this story is about the fact that it seems NBC refused to air an ad put together by some Catholic outfit that features an embryo and all of the hardships it faced in early life ending up with the revelation that they were talking about Obama. Here is the ad , check it out and see how unoffensive it is. Like I said, if I watched them I'd quit now. :-/

Viva California! USA out of California Now!

Gene Veith points to a Russian who predicts the breakup the American Empire. Gene is somehow unaware of the dozens of secessionist movements in various states. Granted they are almost all small but still, they exist and this could be a good time for us. Those who know me already understand that I'm a California Nationalist who I doesn't think California should have joined those united States in the first place. Being a part of that empire just costs us money, we get nothing in return. These days we get to be hated by foreigners for being Americans and mocked by Americans for being Californians. Getting us out of the US yesterday would be a day too late as far as I'm concerned.

Government = Violence

What it comes down to is this, any law you propose states this, I will kill you if you do not agree to do "X." I say this because ALL laws say this. All . Jay walking is a "crime." So, what does that mean? It means if you jay walk you risk death at the hands of government enforcers. How so? You are accosted while jay walking by the local police. You say, "Buzz off bucko!" The cop says "you are under arrest!" You say "Not even." They attempt to restrain you and you resist, you are now "resisting arrest" and in the process of subduing you force will be used to make you to comply. The harder you resist the more likely "they" are to simply kill you. All laws imply deadly force. All laws = the death penalty. Of course they won't say you are being killed for the "crime" of jay walking, but for resisting arrest or attempting to escape or whatever, but really it's the original "crim