Skip to main content

Hybelspongism

Following is an excerpt from a Mason Beecroft's "Wayfarer in the Desert" blog about the cancellation of Issues Etc. If you are at all concerned or interested in this huge problem in the LCMS please read the whole article here.

------------------------------------------------------------------

I would argue that there is a prevailing ideology influencing Western Christendom in our day. My neologism for this ideology is “Hybelspongism.” The ideology proclaims that the church must change or it will die. In its liberal forms, this requires widespread acceptance of the cultural and social norms of the day, including tolerance of sexual deviancy, inclusion of all religions while denying the Gospel of Jesus Christ, and embarrassment for Christian faith. Instead, this ideology reduces the church to social activism (inclined toward the Democrats) and bows to pluralism. Spong is a representative figure of this wing. In its conservative forms, Hybelspongism rejects the historic liturgy of the church, direct and consistent proclamation of Christ crucified and resurrected for salvation, and an aversion to catholic and orthodox faith and practice. Rather, conservative Hybelspongism preaches relevance to a world bent on destruction, pandering to prevailing ideologies for the sake of attraction (consumerism, entertainment, democracy, therapy, etc.), and places its hope in the charisma of its leaders and their ability to program in a way that will numb the masses. Hybels, of course, is a figurehead for the conservative branch. Other figures include Osteen and Warren.

If anyone in these branches of Hybelspongism dares to speak against the ideology of their church, then they are immediately dismissed and even destroyed. Consider the current state of orthodox pastors and congregations in the ELCA, Episcopal Church USA, PCUSA, etc. Those who do not get with the program are marginalized, a term I borrowed from the more sensitive bureaucrats in these bodies. In the conservative wing of Hybelspongism, those who do not change the church to get with the times are tagged as fundamentalists and accused of not being missional, concerned or emergent.

Full text here.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NBC anti-life?

I would boycott NBC, if I ever watched it that is. I actually never watch anything on the old line networks, NBC, CBS, ABC, FOX. Everything I watch is on the cable only stations... do they still broadcast over the air? Ah well, this story is about the fact that it seems NBC refused to air an ad put together by some Catholic outfit that features an embryo and all of the hardships it faced in early life ending up with the revelation that they were talking about Obama. Here is the ad , check it out and see how unoffensive it is. Like I said, if I watched them I'd quit now. :-/
Post a Comment
Read more

Viva California! USA out of California Now!

Gene Veith points to a Russian who predicts the breakup the American Empire. Gene is somehow unaware of the dozens of secessionist movements in various states. Granted they are almost all small but still, they exist and this could be a good time for us. Those who know me already understand that I'm a California Nationalist who I doesn't think California should have joined those united States in the first place. Being a part of that empire just costs us money, we get nothing in return. These days we get to be hated by foreigners for being Americans and mocked by Americans for being Californians. Getting us out of the US yesterday would be a day too late as far as I'm concerned.
5 comments
Read more

Government = Violence

What it comes down to is this, any law you propose states this, I will kill you if you do not agree to do "X." I say this because ALL laws say this. All . Jay walking is a "crime." So, what does that mean? It means if you jay walk you risk death at the hands of government enforcers. How so? You are accosted while jay walking by the local police. You say, "Buzz off bucko!" The cop says "you are under arrest!" You say "Not even." They attempt to restrain you and you resist, you are now "resisting arrest" and in the process of subduing you force will be used to make you to comply. The harder you resist the more likely "they" are to simply kill you. All laws imply deadly force. All laws = the death penalty. Of course they won't say you are being killed for the "crime" of jay walking, but for resisting arrest or attempting to escape or whatever, but really it's the original "crim
5 comments
Read more