Skip to main content

Shape Shifting on Veterans Day

by David W. Gorman

Washington Headquarters Executive Director, Disabled American Veterans

On Veterans Day, politicians will praise the 30,000 troops “officially wounded” in action in
Iraq and Afghanistan as if this “statistic” were some kind of “fact.” In doing so, they’ll harm the
men and women who carry the burden of our nation’s defense in today’s very dangerous world.
That 30,000 number is a fantasy.

Here’s the truth about the human cost borne by the troops in Iraq and Afghanistan as shown
by data from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Of the 1.5 million troops who
served in Iraq or Afghanistan, 720,000 (48%) are now veterans in the civilian population.
Of these, 202,000 have filed claims for VA disability benefits. The VA granted benefits in
more than 90% of the cases processed so far, and will grant more upon appeal or presentation of
additional evidence.

In other words, real statistics show that one out of four veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan
is disabled in military service. This should shock no one as troops return to the war zones for
their third, fourth, and now fifth tours of combat duty.

Of the 720,000 veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan, a quarter million have turned to the VA
for treatment – more than one out of every three veterans of the combat theaters.
The figures above don’t include troops still on active duty, many of whom remain in the
service after being harmed by war. They too must not be forgotten.

Yet that 30,000 figure keeps floating in political and media circles as if it had authority.
Well, it all depends on what you count. If you intentionally count to get a low number, you’ll get
a low number. Obviously, someone wants a low number. But what happens as a result?
For one thing, the scandal at Walter Reed Army Medical Center developed as Washington
officials dazzled each other with low “casualty counts,” but this was just the tip of an ugly
iceberg! Even as our troops shed their blood in Afghanistan and Iraq, health care and benefits for veterans have been decaying across the nation.

Our government tried to do war on the cheap, failing to recognize the back-end cost of
veterans with disabilities. True, it increased funding for VA programs each year – by amounts far below the rapidly increasing needs of our disabled heroes.

By using the tightest definition to minimize the casualty count, politicians deny reality,
preparing a ruinous future for all disabled veterans, especially our youngest generation. In no
way is America prepared to deal with the aftermath of today’s wars as it will be experienced by
veterans in the VA.

This is not meant as criticism of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, but to present a more
complete picture of the sacrifices made by our men and women in uniform.

Much is made of the idea that veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan differ from past generations
of America’s defenders. Actually, that’s been true of every generation of veterans to date, and
the veterans’ movement has accommodated those differences.

But one thing will always be the same. Veterans age, and the costs of war last a lifetime.
A soldier who suffers a severe brain injury in Iraq today will still be a disabled veteran 60
years from now when reaching the age of today’s World War II veterans. Our nation will still
owe that veteran every care in the world.

We must not allow self-serving rhetoric to shortchange any American hero – not now, not
ever!

# # #

Donate to DAV

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NBC anti-life?

I would boycott NBC, if I ever watched it that is. I actually never watch anything on the old line networks, NBC, CBS, ABC, FOX. Everything I watch is on the cable only stations... do they still broadcast over the air? Ah well, this story is about the fact that it seems NBC refused to air an ad put together by some Catholic outfit that features an embryo and all of the hardships it faced in early life ending up with the revelation that they were talking about Obama. Here is the ad , check it out and see how unoffensive it is. Like I said, if I watched them I'd quit now. :-/

Wikileaks and police state censorship

I saw an article today on SF Gate about some nit wit Bush appointed Federal Judge ordering a website I'd never heard of called Wikileaks shut down because they were publishing some bank documents from some corrupt Swiss bank. The amusing thing is that they can't actually do it! Even more amusing is that this just draws attention to the site and makes it that much more visible, yay idiot goons! :-) There are mirror sites all over the world and it's almost impossible for thuggish police state goons to figure out how to close off all of the leaks :-) One mirror site is here: http://wikileaks.be/wiki/Wikileaks The US site they tried to close down is still here: http://88.80.13.160 "Cowardice asks the question, 'Is it safe?' Expediency asks the question, 'Is it politic?' Vanity asks the question, 'Is it popular?' But, conscience asks the question, 'Is it right?' And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe,

Viva California! USA out of California Now!

Gene Veith points to a Russian who predicts the breakup the American Empire. Gene is somehow unaware of the dozens of secessionist movements in various states. Granted they are almost all small but still, they exist and this could be a good time for us. Those who know me already understand that I'm a California Nationalist who I doesn't think California should have joined those united States in the first place. Being a part of that empire just costs us money, we get nothing in return. These days we get to be hated by foreigners for being Americans and mocked by Americans for being Californians. Getting us out of the US yesterday would be a day too late as far as I'm concerned.